![]() ![]() That, in my own opinion, gave residents a false impression, eventually leading to a complete revolt in the community, when confronted with a road bond election. Our county's plan has been in place for quite some time, but it was not ever presented to the residents as an option. So then, as a consequence, the road issue became a huge concern for many residents. ![]() Our lady volunteered to work on the road issues, the Methodist Pastor decided to let go (it was said that he wanted to be mayor), and like our lady, the lawyer also went on a "road" trip. To make it more clear, one of them was voted out of his position and two moved on to other related business activities. Two positions are being filled with new candidates in this election and two are being challenged. Now, four of those people have stepped down and others have filed to run for office. Someone has to do the job and after all, like the lady once said, the pay is not the greatest in the world (Directors are not paid anything for their work). ![]() In Montgomery County, this has been a longstanding tradition. In the background, they were preparing for development and business opportunities (criticism/conflict of interest). They performed their new government jobs in an open and direct way (kudos), following the law. The problem in some folks view is that one (or all) of them had ties to contractors and/or properties involved in development or related contracts. ![]() Their motives were in local business and political power. When the Township was founded by transferring and consolidating all local HOA's into one entity, the "Township", several of those on the Board came along free as new government directors. Originally, several influential people were put on a Town Center Board. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |